quizgen.dev
Start free

A Jotform alternative for developers and AI agents

Comparisons

Jotform is one of the most complete form builders you can buy: a template gallery in the tens of thousands, a long list of field types, a huge integration directory, and a drag-and-drop editor that non-technical teams genuinely like. If that's what you're shopping for, QuizGen is not a smaller version of it — it's a different model entirely.

The actual difference

Jotform is editor-first. You (or a teammate) open the builder, start from one of 10,000+ templates or a blank canvas, drag fields into place, style the result, and publish. Jotform AI helps too — but it helps inside the editor, drafting a form you then adjust by hand.

QuizGen has no editor to open. A form is a JSON definition — written by you, or by an AI assistant you point at quizgen.dev/llms.txt or the MCP server at quizgen.dev/mcp — and one POST turns it into a live quizgen.dev/q/... link. "Make me a 6-question lead qualifier that scores itself" is a sentence to your assistant, not a session in a builder.

Where Jotform is simply better

Be honest with yourself about these — if you need them, use Jotform:

  • File uploads on a budget. Both have them, but QuizGen's are paid-plan only: Pro gets 10 MB per file and 1 GiB of storage, Business gets 25 MB and 10 GiB. Free-plan and sandbox forms can't include a file-upload question at all.
  • E-signatures. Jotform supports signature fields and has a dedicated sign product. QuizGen doesn't do signatures.
  • Payment processor choice. Jotform connects to many payment processors out of the box. QuizGen takes payments too — a payment question on the Business plan charges the card in-form via Stripe — but Stripe is the only processor.
  • Template shopping and visual control. If the fastest path is browsing a gallery and tweaking, or the form's look will be judged pixel by pixel, an editor beats JSON.
  • A generous hosted free tier with a wide feature surface across its five free forms.

Where QuizGen wins

  • An AI assistant does the building. Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor reads /llms.txt (or connects to the MCP server) and goes from your sentence to a live link — no field-dragging, by you or the AI.
  • Zero-friction start. POST with no auth header and you get a live sandbox quiz, no account, live for 72 hours with up to 10 responses and claimable later.
  • Scoring and outcomes are core schema, not an add-on: point maps and result buckets for lead qualification and "which X are you?" quizzes.
  • Forms as code. The definition is JSON validated against a published schema (/schema/v1.json), so it can live in your repo, get code review, and deploy from CI like everything else you ship.

Pick Jotform if / pick QuizGen if

Pick Jotform if: you need e-signatures or its wider integration directory; a non-technical teammate owns the forms; or you want to start from a template and fine-tune visually.

Pick QuizGen if: an AI assistant (or a script) should create and manage forms; you want scoring/outcomes without add-ons; or you want form definitions versioned in your own codebase instead of inside someone else's editor.

The whole build step, in one request

curl -X POST https://quizgen.dev/api/v1/quizzes \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  --data '{ "schema_version": 1, "title": "Coffee or tea?",
    "sections": [ { "key": "main", "questions": [
      { "id": "pick", "type": "choice", "prompt": "Coffee or tea?",
        "options": [ { "value": "coffee", "label": "Coffee" },
                     { "value": "tea", "label": "Tea" } ] } ] } ] }'

No auth header means the link above is a 72-hour, 10-response sandbox. Keep it by signing up free — 3 live quizzes, 100 answers each per month, no card — at quizgen.dev/login.

Comparing against Typeform instead? That write-up is here.

Full docs, meant to be read by your AI assistant: quizgen.dev/llms.txt.

$ curl quizgen.dev/blog/jotform-alternative.md

This guide as raw markdown — no HTML for your agent to parse.

View .md

Keep reading